The persistent
buzzword for
better skin.
A closer look at carboxytherapy, with insights from Dr. Lisa Zdinak of Precision Aesthetics MD.
Originally published in 2024. Editorial context on treatment evidence added October 2026.
In a world brimming with beauty treatments, it’s easy to get lost, spend a small fortune, or both. Carboxytherapy has remained part of the conversation—but what should readers make of its promise?
For the original feature, MSM consulted Dr. Lisa Zdinak of Precision Aesthetics MD in New York City about the procedure and the skin concerns she uses it to address.
Carbon dioxide,
beneath the surface.
Carboxytherapy involves introducing carbon dioxide gas just beneath the skin. It is a medical procedure, rather than a topical skin-care product.
In the original interview, Dr. Zdinak described changes in circulation and tissue remodeling as part of the rationale for treatment. The feature explored its use for concerns including cellulite, stretch marks, laxity, and wrinkles. Those proposed applications should be distinguished from proof of a consistent benefit for every patient or concern.
One approach.
Several areas of interest.
Dr. Zdinak emphasized the range of areas she treats with carboxytherapy:
“It can be used on virtually any part of the body, including the face, neck, abdomen, arms, and legs. This makes it an excellent option for those looking to address multiple areas of concern with a single treatment modality.”Dr. Lisa Zdinak · Original MSM interview
The original article also highlighted limited downtime and the possibility of a course of treatments followed by maintenance. A clinician’s assessment is needed to discuss suitability, likely benefits, side effects, and the treatment plan for a particular concern.
Promising does not mean guaranteed.
The American Academy of Dermatology describes early evidence that carboxytherapy may reduce the appearance of cellulite. It cites a small study in which 10 women received eight treatments and had a modest improvement.
The same guidance identifies discomfort during treatment and temporary bruising as possible side effects. These findings do not establish that the treatment is universally safe, effective for every skin concern, or reliably long-lasting.
Editorial reference: American Academy of Dermatology — Cellulite treatments: What really works? ↗
A more informed consultation.
For readers considering treatment, the useful next step is a discussion with a qualified dermatologist about the specific concern, the evidence for improvement, alternatives, and personal medical history. A treatment’s appeal should rest on realistic expectations as well as its promise.
Practice featured in the original article: Precision Aesthetics MD ↗